The magazine The Economist published an issue named “The World in 2015″. What do the so-called elite have in store for 2015?
The Economist is not a random newspaper. It is directly connected to those who shape global policies and who make sure that they are applied. The publication is partly owned by the Rothschild banking family of England and its editor regularly attends Bilderberg meetings. In other words, The Economist is connected to those who have the means and the power to make ‘predictions’ a reality.
What do I know about this, from inside sources? I know George Clooney has referred to himself in the past as ‘the Pied Piper’ to a former colleague of mine. That same former colleague told me, I was referred to as Alice in Wonderland. The Pied Piper of Hamelin is a German legend about a man who used his magical flute (made of metal) to lure away the children of the city of Hamelin, never to be seen again. This folkloric figure dating from the Middle-Ages is said to represent either massive death by plague or catastrophe, or a movement of massive immigration. It also perfectly represents today’s youth being “lured” and mystified by the “music” of mass media. And on this cover he is luring two Orange fishes. The secret service agent in black is looking through spectacles to the left, perhaps to check who else is following the Pied Piper. In fact, four people are looking to the left: Alice, Bachelet, Cameron and the covert agent. The three ‘artists’ all look to the right. The others face towards the camera.
What can I say from what I know reading the media? First, I notice all the elite political leaders are shown with their faces in black and white, like they are not real. Michelle Bachelet of Chili is present in full-colour and looks to the left. Surprisingly, also Aung San Suu Kyi is one of the black and whites. And Winston Churchill (prime-minister UK 1940-1945) is shown in a similar way. In the back, we see an ISIS masked man, also colored black and white. On the left, Goodluck Jonathan of Nigeria (still fighting Boko Haram) standing next to Hillary Clinton. Odd is also how Napoleon is featured in colors. Both Churchill and Napoleon are known for their leadership in wartime.Churchill is most known for his victory sign, while Napoleon is remembered with a saying about Waterloo. The Alexander McQueen model in her ‘Savage Beauty” outfit is in colour, except for the eggs.
What can I say from what I know reading the media? The painting on the right sitting on a pile of dirt is the “La belle ferronnière” supposedly painted by Leonardo da Vinci, in the Louvre. The woman might have been the wife of an ironmonger, was said to be the mistress of Francis I of France, yet married to a certain Le Ferron. The tale of revenge is that the aggrieved husband intentionally infects himself with syphilis, which he passes to the king through infecting his wife.
What can I say from just what I know from general media access? If the two arrows mean Biblical verses…. Psalm 11:3 says “When the foundations are being destroyed, what can the righteous do?” and Psalm 11:5 says “The LORD examines the righteous, but the wicked, those who love violence, he hates with a passion”. Another explanation is 11/3 and 11/5 as a date.
You now what? I think all this symbolism is part of the idiocracy. Do you know why they do all this? They have been feeding my former colleagues, myself, and I am sure many other people throughout the world with stories about ‘what would happen’ expressed in symbols and historic examples and all sorts of bullshit. Why? Because now, years later, all these people look at the cover of the Economist and realize: They will enroll their plans and there is nothing we can do about it (it is already on the cover of the paper!). So many people have been given little stories about ‘what will happen’ and they recognize these little stories now in the drawings of the Economists, without understanding the bigger picture, since that is “need to know”. All these symbols and stories and media exposure… it all has one objective: For normal rational good people to feel powerless, like it is a done deal (behind their back). And that my friends, is crazy. If we don’t want this bullshit, we should not accept this bullshit. Let them explain their plans to us in normal language, because they sure sound like crazy people right now. And the journalists from the Economists? They don’t sound like journalists in a free market economy to me. Whores servicing a mad house, who try to take over our democratic countries! [they have reasonably well succeeded, so far!]
p.s. If you want to study the cover in detail, this [LINK] shows a good close-up.
p.p.s. If you want the formal reply of the Economists on their cover, read here [LINK].